Joel Madero píše v St 20. 06. 2012 v 08:08 -0700: > Thanks for the advice. I thought I had included the qa list, my > mistake. As for the length, I agree and I almost didn't include it but > that was an email in response to mine so I felt a bit obligated to > respond despite the length.
If only I had more time to react early in this interesting discussion :-) > I had another side question, the response to the thread was made here: > http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Cleaning-bug-list-td3988836i20.html#a3991106 > > I never got an email about the response, instead it was only part of > the digest. Is this the norm because the response was made through > nabble? I was just lucky that I read the digest and saw that there was > a response, otherwise that person would have never heard back from me > about all of his concerns. I see, bfo sent the response only to the mailing list. The problem is that different people has different style in handling mailing lists. I prefer to stay in CC because I monitor mailing lists less frequently. Hence, I keep also other people in CC. I know many other guys that do not want to get mails twice (from mailing list and from CC), so they remove themselves and all other people from CC. I am afraid that we can't do much about it. Both approaches have some advantages :-) > Thanks again for the feedback, I think this topic is about exhausted > at least for now. I'll get something up on the site where you > suggested as well as a little blurb about it unless Rainer suggests > otherwise. Yup, I need to do some other work as well. I have spent too much time with mails the previous two days ;-) Best Regards, Petr _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
