Hi Matúš, seems I missed answering this..
On Wednesday, 2012-06-13 22:54:55 +0200, Matúš Kukan wrote: > I have no idea what's the difference between > - ExecMethod = Execute and putting code to sc/source/ui/view/cellsh3.cxx > - ExecMethod = ExecuteEdit and code in sc/source/ui/view/cellsh1.cxx > Probably it does not matter ? I think that technically it doesn't matter, I'm not even sure myself which one would be ideal.. it seems that for invoking a general dialog Execute is better suited. > The second is a mess. > I was struggling with Set/GetUserData for a while and created struct > AccountContact hack. > Surely there is a better way ? What's wrong with that struct? User data can be only one void* so whatever needs to be wrapped up in there.. the AccountContact struct seems ok to me. However, I'm missing the destruction of the created instances, this looks like a memory leak. There may also be some g_object_unref() calls necessary on the TpAccount and TpContact instances to ensure proper life time. > You can run LibreOffice with > LIBO_TUBES=slave ./soffice --calc on both sides and it works. > Well, only if they are different machines, but that's the only > scenario, I guess. > Locally you need the master / slave differentiation. s/machine/user/ ;-) Of course being able to run under the same user account is a hack needed for testing, running with different users on the same machine should be possible though. Eike -- LibreOffice Calc developer. Number formatter stricken i18n transpositionizer. GnuPG key 0x293C05FD : 997A 4C60 CE41 0149 0DB3 9E96 2F1A D073 293C 05FD
pgptLpPDLdKDw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
