sw/qa/uitest/writer_tests7/tdf144439.py |    3 +--
 sw/source/core/doc/number.cxx           |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

New commits:
commit a31a7b53c42eef3a8007766c60ec5a2539054a7c
Author:     Vasily Melenchuk <vasily.melenc...@cib.de>
AuthorDate: Mon Apr 18 14:36:37 2022 +0300
Commit:     Vasily Melenchuk <vasily.melenc...@cib.de>
CommitDate: Mon Apr 18 20:07:48 2022 +0200

    tdf#147472: sw: bug in numbering with previous level NONE
    
    Previous fix for tdf#146257 was not complete and was not able to
    take care of disabled numebering started just at beginning of the
    numbering string.
    
    UI test test_tdf144439_outline with modifications is covering this
    situation. No need in extra testcases.
    
    Change-Id: Id17838cec7fb4fb039f9b457b7ee9ad3ab345678
    Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/133124
    Tested-by: Jenkins
    Reviewed-by: Vasily Melenchuk <vasily.melenc...@cib.de>

diff --git a/sw/qa/uitest/writer_tests7/tdf144439.py 
b/sw/qa/uitest/writer_tests7/tdf144439.py
index 103d64f84f18..34911ee4c542 100644
--- a/sw/qa/uitest/writer_tests7/tdf144439.py
+++ b/sw/qa/uitest/writer_tests7/tdf144439.py
@@ -71,8 +71,7 @@ class tdf144439(UITestCase):
             Paragraphs = document.Text.createEnumeration()
             Para1 = Paragraphs.nextElement()
             self.assertEqual(Para1.String, "Outline2")
-            # Well, this looks strange, but we asked to show 1 & 2 levels and 
1st is without numbering
-            self.assertEqual(Para1.getPropertyValue("ListLabelString"), ".1")
+            self.assertEqual(Para1.getPropertyValue("ListLabelString"), "1")
 
             with 
self.ui_test.execute_dialog_through_command(".uno:ChapterNumberingDialog") as 
xDialog:
                 # Select level "1"
diff --git a/sw/source/core/doc/number.cxx b/sw/source/core/doc/number.cxx
index 0615c9a912d5..4e353a2b2803 100644
--- a/sw/source/core/doc/number.cxx
+++ b/sw/source/core/doc/number.cxx
@@ -704,7 +704,7 @@ OUString SwNumRule::MakeNumString( const 
SwNumberTree::tNumberVector & rNumVecto
                 OUString sFind("%" + OUString::number(i + 1) + "%");
                 sal_Int32 nPositionToken = sLevelFormat.indexOf(sFind);
                 sal_Int32 nPositionNextToken = sLevelFormat.indexOf('%', 
nPositionToken + sFind.getLength());
-                if (nPositionToken > 0 && nPositionNextToken >= nPositionToken)
+                if (nPositionToken >= 0 && nPositionNextToken >= 
nPositionToken)
                 {
                     sLevelFormat = sLevelFormat.replaceAt(nPositionToken, 
nPositionNextToken - nPositionToken, u"");
                 }

Reply via email to