On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 01:28:00PM +0200, David Tardon wrote: > Hi all, > > I pushed feature/gbuild_merge branch that merges 4 gbuild-related > branches rebased on current (~3 days old) master. It seems it still > builds fine on linux and mingw, but I would appreciate more testing. The > current plan is to get it back into master before 3.6 feature freeze, > which do not leave much time (Sorry it took me so much time to do the > merge, but there were a lot of changes, e.g., the recent TDE > integration, and feature/gbuild_connectivity was really old (created in > December or so)). > > The branch contains conversion of 5 modules to gbuild: connectivity, > reportbuilder, scp2, shell and testtools. > ...
After 3 days of fixing, it reportedly builds on MacOS X and Windows now (big thanks to Norbert, Matus, David and Noel for testing!) Therefore I am going to merge it tomorrow morning (around 6.00 UTC). > The number of modules newly added to tail_build is not as good as I > expected--only 9, if I counted correctly. On the other side all the > really big ones are there already :-) There is experimental branch > feature/tail_build that adds 19 more, but it requires a change to > build.pl, so I do not intend to push it into 3.6 . Of course, if people > who actually know something about the build.pl script look at commit > 726ac115a981567b3f41613d0e0163bd010e6b17 and tell me that I am not a > total idiot, or even that it might work at the right phase of moon, I > can be convinced otherwise :-) I have run another ~15 builds of this branch with different configurations on Linux and MinGW and did not notice any problem, so I am more in favour of using it even for 3.6. And since I have not received any negative response on it (Michael was in favour of it and Norbert indifferent), I am going to merge it too, after all. D. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
