I noticed this just now at the start of make.
cd packimages && unset MAKEFLAGS && \
/Users/eagles051387/core/solenv/bin/build.pl -P4 --all -- -P4
&& \
make -j 4 -rs
Seeing as Mac 10.7.4 is running make 3.81 could i be getting bitten by the -j4
switch above?
i changed my autogen back to i386 and even after running a make clean and
rerunning make i get a failure in soltools :(
http://pastebin.com/CYEANUip
the build error log is above.
Seems like when i try and make clean on the soltools module it gives an error
below
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh dear - something failed during the build - sorry !
For more help with debugging build errors, please see the section in:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development
internal build errors:
ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making
/Users/eagles051387/core/soltools/mkdepend
it seems that the error is inside '', please re-run build
inside this module to isolate the error and/or test your fix:
build_error.log should contain the captured output of the failed module(s)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
To rebuild a specific module:
make .clean # optional
make
when the problem is isolated and fixed, re-run 'make'
make[1]: *** [soltools] Error 1
make: *** [clean] Error 2
Regards
Jonathan Aquilina
On 22 May 2012, at 15:11, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> Hi David, *,
>
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 2:07 PM, <d.ostrov...@idaia.de> wrote:
>> Zitat von Christian Lohmaier <lohmaier+libreoff...@googlemail.com>:
>>> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Jonathan Aquilina
>>> <eagles051...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I am trying to build master on my mac using clang.
>>>>
>>>> only modification i made was to build for 64bit.
>>>
>>> "only modification".... You're a funny one...
>>
>> have you forgot to place a smily here ;-)
>
> Well, yes, it is implied :-)
>
>>> * Neither is building against something else than the 10.4SDK
>>> something that has been tested
>
> Tor did correct me on that one - so compiling against the 10.6SDK is
> supposed to work, although not an option for builds released for the
> general public for obvious reasons (missing compatibility with 10.4
> and 10.5)
>
>>> * and even less so is creating a 64bit build on Mac.
>> [...]
>> I could look at 64-bit MacOSX build, if i had mac resources ...
>> Or may be you (or your thinderbox) can compile for me and I would try to do
>> it without mac ;-)?
>
> "you" as in me? :-)
> Then the answer is "no", as I only have a PPC mac with Mac OSX 10.4 -
> so neither can I try compiling for newer SDKs nor can I try with a
> intel build...
>
> I might attempt cross-compiling for Intel, but its unlikely that I
> will try it with that machine, since despite beeing quite beefy (Dual
> 2.5Ghz G5, 2GB RAM), compared to Linux the build is dead slow. (fully
> ccached the fastest ones (i.e. those with no changes in between still
> take >100minutes - typical build time is more like 3 to 4 hours)
>
> "you" as in "whoever reads this"
> Might be an option - as there are tinderboxes that build from ramdisk
> and can complete a build in 15 minutes...
> But I don't see any benefit of a 64bit build.
>
> ciao
> Christian
> _______________________________________________
> LibreOffice mailing list
> LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
