Hi Daniel,
Daniel Naber-2 wrote > >> If Lightproof could use LT lexicons, that could be a temporary solution, >> but maybe memory-consuming, as you would have a dictionary for spell >> checking and a lexicon for grammar checking. > > I have never tried that but I think the finite state machine used > internally > by LT is quite memory-friendly. > I had a look in the old LanguageTool written in Python. It uses the library cPickle (renamed now pickle). I never used it. Resource intensive, right ? In the Java code, there is a fsa library... Not sure there is the same thing in Python. Looking for something similar… Daniel Naber-2 wrote > > If we could work together more closely that would be great. As you know, > each rule in LT has an id so it can be identified. Maybe that id could be > used to keep track of similar rules. > Dominique already asked for it, but I hadn’t the time to work on Grammalecte the last months. I’ll try to do that. Daniel Naber-2 wrote > > Does LightProof also have integrated > test sentences? Then LT could use them to see what rules are missing in LT > and vice-versa. > No. At the moment, there is no stand-alone version of Lightproof. Regards, Olivier -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/PATCH-3-5-fdo-35270-kill-first-use-grammar-checker-freeze-tp3983822p3985233.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
