Hi Markus, On Saturday, 2012-05-12 02:33:42 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
> I think the best solution would be to move all > conditional format entries out of the style section and only reference > the styles later. > [...] > I just fear that this is such a big incompatible > change that we will not get this into ODF. Well, I think at some point/version ODF will have to be incompatible in specific areas. Getting the TC to decide that already the next version should be an incompatible one probably is the hard part.. > Advantages: All ack'ed. > Disadvantages: > - incompatible changes > - maybe would not make it through the oasis committee Dito ;) > The other not so clean solution but more likely accepted solution is > to add also a new section for conditional formats. But instead of > moving all conditional formatting information just store the range in > this section. This is an approach that should work and also pass the TC quite unanimously.. > Advantages: > - less invasive > - will not break compatibility > > Disadvantages: > - need to introduce some non style parts into the style section Um.. why? what? how? > - not easily extendable I don't see a problem in your sketch to extend things, what would it be? > - information about conditional formats are divided between two places > - looks horribly wrong if you write a the structure into xml and think > about what it actually means (I know this is a bad argument but I > can't better describe my feeling here) I can sense that feeling.. So, what we could do is prepare two proposals, the clean incompatible one and the ugly more compatible one ;-) It's then up to the TC to decide. Eike -- LibreOffice Calc developer. Number formatter stricken i18n transpositionizer. GnuPG key 0x293C05FD : 997A 4C60 CE41 0149 0DB3 9E96 2F1A D073 293C 05FD
pgpMUJEQ3gSOG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
