On 04.11.2020 13:51, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
That a reference is something completely different than a pointer shows e.g. in the rule that if a class has an implicit copy constructor and a non-static data member of reference type, then the copy constructor is defined as deleted (while there is no such rule if the data member is of pointer type).
I always had an impression that this is an obvious consequence of the special initialization semantics of the references?
-- Best regards, Mike Kaganski _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
