Hi,
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 8:48 AM Stephan Bergmann <sberg...@redhat.com> wrote: > Sure, can't hurt to document the approach you've taken. So if that's > not much additional work, sounds good to me to add a script to > dev-tools. You can add me as reviewer. Alright, I'll do that then. Just one more thing I need to mention. At some point during the build/analysis, I run into the following: The analyzer (or make, I can't tell which) goes looking for '/usr/bin/clang-10++' (which isn't there) instead of '/usr/bin/clang++-10'. In other words, it looks for clang-version++ instead of clang++-version. I haven't really investigated much, but chose to be pragmatic and just add a symlink to work around the issue. If this is an acceptable workaround, I'll add a README that mentions this. On the other hand, if this is a dealbreaker and people want this 'fixed' before continuing, then I am going to need a lot of help in finding the root cause (so I can submit a bug report with the project that causes the behaviour). > (I've not yet come around to > thinking about how to handle the false positives, which would IMO be a > prerequisite to running this on a regular basis.) > Understood. - Maarten
_______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
