On 11/04/12 12:10, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > I.e. does he want to develop a (64-bit) Java "extension" that would be > run in a JVM instantiated in the (32-bit, on Windows) LO process, or > use UNO to invoke interfaces in LO from a (64-bit) Java process? > > I thought that in the latter case the normal thing was that the Java > code and LO are in separate processes? So in theory that the Java > process is 64-bit and the LO one 32-bit should not matter? I might of > course be quite confused, though.
IIRC in URE there is a "jpipe" library that is loaded into the JVM process via JNI, and that has to match the ABI of the JVM of course. > That said, the work required to make LO work as 64-bit code for > Windows is not necessarily that huge. It's just a question of somebody > having the time and inspiration to work on it. It's definitely not > trivial either, though. yes, so i guess this work would need to be finished in order to use x86_64 JVM on Windows. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
