Hey, 2012/3/24 Tommy <ba...@quipo.it>: > On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 10:34:16 +0100, Michael Meeks <michael.me...@suse.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Tommy, >> >> Thanks for your mail ! :-) >> >> On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 06:29 +0100, Tommy wrote: >>> >>> > + about 1/2 of the calc regressions are already fixed in 3.5 >>> > + 3.4.x will get no more updates >>> > + no need to explain more, close them. >>> > AA: + review and re-close these / discuss in QA call (Rainer) >>> >>> I wonder what will happen to the still open 3.4.x most annoying bugs (23 >>> bugs yet). https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 >> >> >> Good question - I guess one for the QA call later today (it'd be >> great >> to have you there). I suppose we should (as you say) check that they are >> all either fixed in 3.5.x and/or make them 'most annoying' for 3.5. I >> guess volunteers to do that work (if that's what QA decides) are also >> appreciated :-) >> > > > well, I can try to re-test the open "3.4.x MAB" on 3.5.1 to see which one > could be > considered FIXED and which one are still affecting the 3.5.x family so they > could > be moved to "3.5.x MAB" page. > > for example this bug: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39006 > is still reproducible in 3.5.1 (see my report) so could be added to "3.5.x > MAB" > > I did not add it yet because I want official permission to do that. > I'd also leave that bug on the "3.4.x MAB" page just for historical > reference. > > probably Reiner anf the guys from QA could adda message at the bottom of the > 3.4.x MAB page > telling user that 3.4.x will be no longer developed so any further bug > nomination should be > done in the 3.5.x MAB page >
I closed all these bugs. There are still two open bugs that I think are fixed but need to talk to Noel about them. Calc should be now down to 5 open regression bugs. Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
