On Friday 22 of November 2019, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 22/11/2019 12:13, Luboš Luňák wrote: > > On Thursday 21 of November 2019, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > >> * Too much trivial SAL_INFO noise (that was once added ad-hoc and should > >> arguably have only been in a developer's local build) can make it > >> unnecessarily hard to see the more relevant SAL_INFOs (and log area > >> granularity is limited in practice). Of course, it is hard to tell how > >> much of the existing SAL_INFO use falls under that noise category. > > > > If I'm not mistaken, all SAL_INFO is disabled by default, which > > trivially solves that. > > I meant the scenario where you enable one specific +INFO.area and the > noise ratio for that area is high (like is the case for sal.osl, from my > personal experience).
SAL_LOG=+INFO.sal.osl-INFO.sal.osl.noisyarea . Problem solved :). -- Luboš Luňák l.lu...@collabora.com _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
