Hi, > However something I noticed is that there are still some problems with > entering the 'Prefix name" in the options, firstly the input box seems to be > overwritten by the label ( part of the input/edit field for the prefix is > missing until you type )
Hmm, strange, I haven't notice that myself. > Additionally you still can get the prefix name to > be blank ( or at least I managed to do that ) by attempting to change the > name by delete, when all the name is deleted you get a message saying the > sheet prefix is illegal ( actually I find that behaviour annoying e.g. I > would prefer/expect the error after I press ok ) And if fact with the blank > ( from the error scenario above ) you can press ok and now the default > prefix is blank :-) For me allowing a blank prefix is a feature and not a bug! If someone wants to have his/her default worksheets named with only numbers (1, 2, 3...) who are we to deny him/her of that? Unless there is some technical reason against that I have overlooked of course. > Anyway since this is master and 3.6 is some time away > there is time to fix it. Anyway looking forward to the next iteration of > this, keep up the great work Yes, I will have another look at this. Thanks Noel for pushing it. /Albert _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
