On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 11:21 +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 01/26/2012 10:52 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> > humm... we don't need stlport these day... we only build it for
> > external extensions that may still need it...
I forget when that happened, but you're really best off with the 3.5
builds where stlport is certainly optional.
> > but surely for OpenSolaris existing base of extension is probably
> > not a critical issue....
>
> ...and any existing C++ extensions for Solaris would not work, anyway,
> as they are compiled against the Sun Studio ABI, not the GCC one.
Of course :-) but I've never seen a binary Solaris extension in the
wild, so ... stlport is one to happily ignore.
HTH,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
