On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 08:21 +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > Hi Cor, > > On 2012-01-26 at 00:16 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote: > > > >> Also I changed the ZOOM_FACTOR from 1.1 to 2^(1/4), it feels better > > >> here, the 1.1 means way too much wheel rotation to increase / decrease > > >> the zoom considerably; but of course can be changed easily when another > > >> [..] > > > > > > I also thought that 1.2 was a better fit so fine with me. > > > > Hmm, the issue was that the zoom factor also is used for the + and - in > > the zoom slider at the status bar. Jumping from 100 to 125% or so, is > > way to fast. Of course just IMHO .. > > > > What do others think ? > > In my experience, I was never really using the +/-, because the +-5% > step always made me clicking like mad to achieve what I needed, and in > most cases I just fell back to using the slider directly (dragging the > indicator); so I believe increasing the step for the +/- is the right > thing to do here too - but maybe it is just me :-) >
Howdy Kendy Well, I'm with Cor on this one - I use that a fair bit also and the finer step is usually what I am looking for. However as you say there are times it's a real pain and with the slider it's rather had to get precise control. Instead of increasing the step amount by five fold I would rather see the +/- auto-repeat if you hold the mouse button down. Not sure how that would fair with keyboard bound users though. Best wishes, //drew _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
