On 24/01/12 16:12, Lubos Lunak wrote: > On Tuesday 24 of January 2012, Michael Stahl wrote: >> On 23/01/12 21:31, Lubos Lunak wrote:
>>> It seems to be quite a common way for LO code to use this >>> let's-push-all-the-data-as-properties-one-by-one approach, so I wonder >>> what the common way of avoiding this problem is? Preferably something >>> that's not an ugly hack, excuse the naivety. >> >> i'm not aware of a general solution for this problem; i'm afraid if >> there are good reasons not do a change as above, then ugly hack is in >> order... i don't remember running into such a problem before, probably >> this kind of dependency is quite rare. > > I've eventually settled on db0f839920c38973f8448df0f74de7c4c95c832c , could > somebody review and push to 3.5? that shouldn't break anything, pushed: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?h=libreoffice-3-5&id=17ccd3cfc9dd86e2911a0a31f6dcbba8d7e7950a _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
