Hi Michael, 2012/1/12 Michael Meeks <michael.me...@suse.com>: > Hi Miklos, > > On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 21:26 +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote: >> I've implemented a progressbar for rtf import yesterday: > > Nice work ! :-) > >> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=92c7b6733e55a6ab62bc231ecf0ffd5c0da7c8d2 >> >> There are two bugreports requesting this: fdo#38057 and fdo#44157. The >> second calls this a 3.4 -> 3.5 regression, which is true. > > I think we're fairly happy about regressions here given the > improvements in the code, but it'd be nice to fix for sure. > >> What is better - should I cherry-pick this to -3-5, introducing a new >> string to be localized or respect string freeze and ignore this being a >> regression? (It's unfortune that till now I was not aware so far that >> this is a regression, sure.) > > IIRC the translators would need to approve any such break; Andras - > what review / approval mechanism do we use there ? Given that the exact > same string "Loading Document ..." occurs in starmath and writer > already, I'd hope that they'd be sympathetic :-) > We don't have process for that. The best solution would be, if I leveraged translation from sw for each language. So translators won't even notice. What a pity that writerfilter cannot use sw's resources directly. :)
Best regards, Andras _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
