Hi, On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 02:57:23PM +0100, Samuel Thibault <sthiba...@hypra.fr> wrote: > It's interesting. One frightening thing however is "we assume the > default XML parser which is expat", and the _start_list (which should > actually be _start with python3) and _end hooks are not even documented. > When the python interpreter is provided by the system you wouldn't know > what would work. We could put something which hopefully works because > the hooks happen to have the proper names, or at worse not do anything > and just not print line numbers. I don't know what LO maintainers would > be fine with maintaining :)
If I focus on maintenance, I would just use the same XML parsing infrastructure that we use everywhere else for file import purposes, and the checker would be in C++. We do report line and column numbers when ODF import fails at a specific location. But I didn't want to suggest a rewrite if you decided to go with Python for some reason. Regards, Miklos
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
