Hi Michel, *, On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Michael Stahl <mst...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 14/12/11 23:28, Peter Foley wrote: >> On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Michael Stahl wrote: > [...] > - the spotlight plugin: > no idea if that will actually work; > i really hope we use the system zlib always on MacOS X, because > the old makefile had this horrible thing in it: > > # we have to change the zlib install name, otherwise the plugin will not > work > .IF "$(SYSTEM_ZLIB)"=="NO" > install_name_tool -change @executable_path/libz.1.dylib > @executable_path/../../../../MacOS/libz.1.dylib > $(MACOS)$/OOoSpotlightImporter > .ENDIF
Is changing the installname what you call "horrible thing"? Then you might be surprised that this is not a scary thing at all. *all* LO libs go through this. http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/solenv/inc/unxmacx.mk#175 http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/solenv/gbuild/platform/macosx.mk#145 http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/solenv/bin/macosx-change-install-names.pl There is no concept of a library search path on Mac, all libs explicitly reference the libs they depend on.By absolute paths or relative to the specials executable_path and loader_path I also suggest to read the tinderbox mails. As just removing what seems like a hack to you without providing the "proper" solutin (whatever that might have been in your idea) did broke the build. (the salhelper filename dylib.3 vs just dylib - Norbert did revert that commit today) ciao Christian _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
