Cor Nouws schrieb:
AFAIAC, no need to say sorry for that. It's part of our work that we
carry that happily, isn't it, Rainer ;-)
Hi,
Yes! I did not want to blame anyone, I only regretted our mishap to
catch one of the worse ones of the Source stages of development. And for
me Cor's idea Concerning "Alpha" before branch sounds reasonable. I, for
example misunderstood proceeding (because I did not read the
announcement careful enough) and thought that we are already in the
branch, what now shows that at least one of my decisions to reopen bugs
because Fixes are not in Beta0 might have been wrong. I will watch that.
For testers a reliable statement whether the beta will install in
parallel or replace the stable version would be useful - for example on
<https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/3.5> and in
announcements (where the comment already was for Beta0).
Do we already have any idea why WIN build did not install (at least for
me, <https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43454>)? At least a
normal(parallel) installation should be possible with Beta1).
CU
Rainer
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
