Michael Meeks-5 wrote > ... > From the first days I worked on gnumeric, many of our best test > documents were sent to the developers, and maintained in a semi-private > collection that we used like our crash-testing suite for regression > testing...
If someone wants to start contributing, he'll begin to git clone LO repo so he'll automatically retrieve all test documents (and that's what we want, don't we?). If we'd begin to put specific document in a kind of "semi-private" (which can be accessed by some TBs/Jenkins and core dev/QA people only) repo, in case a commit breaks something concerning a document from this repo, it'll be more difficult to debug this for people who don't have access to this repo. Given the fact that it's not so often to see all TBs green or Jenkins review OK, it'd be even more difficult to achieve this goal. But above all, putting in place a system to manage private files is time consuming + a cost (in terms of money this time). Accepting money for this service wouldn't be a solution since it would remove TDF's independance. Julien -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Please-add-an-option-to-set-bug-reports-to-Private-tp4203277p4203378.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
