On 12/16/2016 07:40 PM, Eike Rathke wrote:
sc/qa/unit/data/functions/statistical/fods/forecast.ets.add.fods | 655 +++++----- 1 file changed, 346 insertions(+), 309 deletions(-)New commits: commit 8bd9e0503ebb6771c543e2fd9a0dc0d2d715f304 Author: Eike Rathke <er...@redhat.com> Date: Fri Dec 16 19:22:52 2016 +0100 adjust rounding decimals to expected values This may have been the cause for some tinderboxes choking on this test on Windows and Mac if the forecast results slightly differed due to the initialization with random values and the calculation taking place with a different internal floating point precision. So let's try. Blindly throwing ROUND(...,12) at all values is wrong anyway because that doesn't take the magnitude of the expected value into account. What we actually want is an accuracy of 12 digits, not an accuracy of 12 decimals. 0.123456789012 1.23456789012 12.3456789012 123.456789012 ... Change-Id: If88d75277c3d17cfd72f36d0f88d093b63da8add
...apparently doesn't fix the problem; <http://ci.libreoffice.org/job/lo_tb_master_mac_dbg/11172/console> still failed with
Testing file:///Users/tdf/lode/jenkins/workspace/lo_tb_master_mac_dbg/sc/qa/unit/data/functions/statistical/fods/forecast.ets.add.fods: /Users/tdf/lode/jenkins/workspace/lo_tb_master_mac_dbg/sc/qa/unit/functions_test.cxx:43:StatisticalFunctionsTest::testStatisticalFormulasFODS double equality assertion failed - Expected: 1 - Actual : 0 - Delta : 1e-14
_______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
