Hi Jan, Jan Iversen píše v Pá 16. 12. 2016 v 16:27 +0100:
> > this change is supposed to be transparent for L10n and > > Documentation teams, but they should know :-) > > It does not seem transparent for the few languages that do not use pootle (sl > and sr) please do not forget those. Thanks for the reminder. I hope Cloph can do the upgrade for them some way that fits them too, though? > It does also influence the help repo (of course), since the change will be a > very big commit. > > > [Or - any objections to this change?] > > No objections as I think it is a good and welcome change, just a question. > > As we discussed in ESC (and Oliver sort of pushed) it seems the goal > is to move away from .xhp to .xhtml (if I understood it correct). If > decided do we then want to do that as a set of small steps or make 1 > script that does it ? I tried to explain on the documentation@ why a big-bang move to html is not a good idea from many reasons in another thread; to name the most important ones: * big-bang "let's abandon one technology and hooray for another one" always brings lots of regressions that are hard to fix in a timely manner; incremental changes are easier to maintain * html does not have markup for some of the semantics that we have (and need) in the help files (like <section> or <embed> to name few) * there are many ways how to describe the same thing in html (<b>'s and <i>'s vs. <strong> and <emph> vs. <div>'s with css vs. who-knows-what) which would make the help harder to maintain, if we eg. want to reuse the information from there to generate other representations (like eg. books or so) > Please just see this as a question of how often to we want to run these > conversions. One more may be needed if we agree that the id="..." attribute could be done non-mandatory, because that one affects the msgctx too. If we want to make the XHP markup look more like HTML markup (which I don't object in general & this is up to agreement between between the Documentation and L10n people), there might be additional conversions needed, for things like <image> -> <img> etc. - but I'd like to keep this separate from the cleanup effort / topic. All the best, Kendy _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
