Hi, Following resolution of bug 102872 [1] (TAN function did not work), I wrote some tests for many of BASIC functions with commit 30166 [2]. Arnaud Versini proposed some improvement [3]. I was wondering if it would be better to have one test file .vb per function : - Advantage : in case of error (function does not work anymore), message will be clearer as it will show the name of the function. With actual behavior, only the name of the test file is displayed, and each test file contains many functions - Drawback : this will create many test files (~100 if I'm not wrong), which may increase time of each build with check
Do you think there are more advantages than drawbacks? If yes, I'm ready to add these functions, but I want first to know if there is some benefit. Best regards, Laurent BP [1] https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102872 [2] https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/gitweb?p=core.git;a=commitdiff;h=8a50ea54546a51fc7a2a28174031e7351dbed10e [3] https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/31592/ ----- LibreOffice 5.1.4.1 -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/QA-test-for-BASIC-functions-tp4202257.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
