On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 02:12:49PM +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote: > Hi Khaled, > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 02:00:13PM +0200, Khaled Hosny > <khaledho...@eglug.org> wrote: > > Now, AFAIK, all glyphs in “Symbol” font have proper characters in > > Unicode (and the font itself supports them as well, in its non-symbol > > cmap subtable), so my question is what is the expected behaviour here, > > map the PUA to proper Unicode characters? Expect the font or a > > compatible one to be installed and usable? Bundle a compatible font? > > We bundle opensymbol (extras/source/truetype/symbol/OpenSymbol.sfd), > isn't that there exactly so that we have no problems when the symbol > font is missing? Or does that have nothing to do with your problem?
It seems to not cover all the symbols in Symbol (what a great font name), or the original bug fixed by the commit in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/30932/ wouldn’t happen in the first place. So my question is really what is the current indented behaviour, as I see loots of mystifying mentions of symbol font, conversion tables and all convoluted stuff I can’t warp my head around. Regards, Khaled
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
