Stephan Bergmann wrote: > As already mentioned briefly in my talk at LOCon, we need to make up > our mind how to handle LO extension dependencies. > Skipping most of this -
> I'd tend to give the fine-grained dependencies a try. > That won't work in practice, unless those can be (semi-)automatically generated. Experience shows that all programmers are lazy, and seldomly go extra miles. Having a simple version string, and some volunteers testing uploaded extensions on the extension repo sounds much more workable - and useful in practice, since no syntactic compatibility one could come up with would ensure semantic equality... Cheers, -- Thorsten
pgp8m7dzjiqVo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
