On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 10:14:49PM +0100, Tomaž Vajngerl wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 8:33 PM, Khaled Hosny <khaledho...@eglug.org> wrote: > > I tried to find what is the source of difference, but to no avail. I > > can’t figure out why the choice of the layout engine can make a > > difference here. > > I don't know the cause and if this is possible but just a quick check > at the svgio code my speculation is that it could make a difference if > it determines for example that text overflows the bounds and it needs > to clip. If you look at the XML and what the test checks you see the > mask primitive is inserted just suddenly. I saw in the svgio code that > the mask primitive is used at many places to do clipping.
Thanks for the pointers, that was very helpful. I now found the part that does the mask; if I set bDoCorrectCanvasClipping to false in svgio/source/svgreader/svgsvgnode.cxx the test passes. Now I need to find the part that actually calculates the bounding box... > You need insert the SVG as you would insert any other image to use > this SVG parser. I tried that as well, they look identical to my eye, though pixel diffing of the generated PDFs shows some 1 pixel or so baseline shift. Might be different font metrics, not sure if that is the cause. Regards, Khaled _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
