> What is the workflow if I see a bug report that might be easy enough to be an > easy hack, but I have > zero knowledge about the underlying code? My ability to evaluate it stops > before the first action step > detailed in response to Problem 4. So, CC Jan and ask his opinion? Does any > keyword need to be set?
Whenever somebody sets keyword=easyhack I get a message next morning, so need for a keyword in that case. No need to put me CC. I control all easyhack and currently set status=NEEDINFO if information is missing. I agree that using keyword=needsDevEval instead would make more sense. rgds jan I. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
