Hi Erike
Every so often I compile and test LibreOffice to ensure that no
regressions have occurred. I've encountered a few over the years that
have even got into the Still version of LibreOffice.
As to whatever CHIINV and MINVERSE does doesn't bother me I don't use
them at all. So, I just delete the offending test in the .fods file and
move on. I never push anything back. That way if any other tests fail
I'll know about them
On my day job I've got a deadline looming for this Friday, 16th August
2016. Once that's out of the way, I may have another look at CHIINV next
week. I'm intrigued why the same binary of LO 5.1.4.2 works on some
environments but not on others.
Alex
On 14/09/16 16:52, Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi Alex,
On Wednesday, 2016-09-14 08:56:21 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
1. either stepping through the code
Well, you can try, but it's a more general problem not restricted to
just one or two functions. Entry point for the CHIINV function would be
in sc/source/core/tool/interpr3.cxx ScInterpreter::ScChiInv()
If you want to get a working build without disabling all checks then you
can use
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/gitweb?p=core.git;a=commitdiff;h=b9a27d5856f60688456762bfcc29c38670009254
that disables the function tests for linux_x86 builds.
However, if you'd find a general solution that does not involve
disabling the tests that would be more than welcomed.
Eike
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
