On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Caolán McNamara <caol...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 05:10 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> More generally: either the accessor is not useful and both set and >> get can go, or it is and the fact that one side is not used is more a >> signe that someone is not using it when it should or not using it >> _yet_ > > If you feel strongly about it,
No I don't feel strongly about it... It is just that I got caught by it, working on a cws, and on top of that it happen to be a non-trivial accessor... but then again, that is what git is for. I search the log for unusedcode.easy related patch that touched that particular source... and found the needed diff :-) Norbert _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
