On 02.03.2016 12:44, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 03/02/2016 12:32 PM, Michael Stahl wrote: >> i think we can do without firebird for now, it's an experimental feature >> anyway so it can be fixed at a later time when somebody gets around to it. > > Given how firebird keeps popping up as one of the worst external modules > whenever you fiddle with a new toolchain, are we sure it'll ever get out > of the experimental feature status? Or would it be time to search for > better alternatives right from the start?
personally i'd be inclined towards alternatives that are less likely to trigger toolchain problems - maybe there's a SQL database implemented in, say, Java somewhere... _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice