On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 23:20:32 +0200 Stephan Bergmann <sberg...@redhat.com> wrote:
> What good is that backport to 3.4? Well, it is a clearcut regression (the error was introduced between 3.3 and 3.4) and a good fix (even breaking on link is better than breaking at runtime) -- so I automatically backported after review. Other than the "needs one signoff"-rule, we have little guidelines on what goes on the release branch. Maybe we should be a little more strict. But I guess still no revert needed? Best, Bjoern -- https://launchpad.net/~bjoern-michaelsen _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
