Hi all, On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 08:40:34 +0200 Stephan Bergmann <sberg...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 09/13/2011 08:18 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > > On 09/12/2011 11:23 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Peter > >> Foley<pefol...@verizon.net> wrote: > >>> > >>> Another gbuild conversion. > >> > >> Nice. > >> > >> Pushed, Thanks. > > > > It ~looks like this broke the latest Mac OSX gcc-4.0.1 (PPC) > > tinderbox build, see > > <http://tinderbox.libreoffice.org/cgi-bin/gunzip.cgi?tree=MASTER&brief-log=1315881022.32373>. > > (Though I have no clue what went wrong; at least cannot easily > > reproduce on unxlngx6.pro.) > > I think the problem is using static libraries. IIRC, on Mac OS X, if > you link against two static libs -lA -lB, order is important, and if > B need symbols from A (that the executable into which the two are > linked does not already take from A), it won't find them. What could > help in this specific case is to switch the order of x2c_support and > x2c_xcd in xml2cmp/Executable_*.mk. (Will try that out on my Mac, > but that can take a while. Another solution might be to use Mac OS X > ld switches -all_load or -force_load.) at http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/tree/solenv/gbuild/platform/unxgcc.mk#n312 for the general gcc case we are wrapping the static libs in the linker command in start-group/end-group, which should help, but it seems like this is missing on the osx platform files. Maybe doing the same there would help? Best, Bjoern -- https://launchpad.net/~bjoern-michaelsen _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
