On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 05:28:53PM +0000, Michael Meeks wrote: 1;2802;0c> > On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 16:49 +0000, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > So, some bisecting shows that its > > Wow =)
Thanks a lot Caolán for the bisect. > > commit 87199d3829257420429057336283c55be6ae7481 > > Author: Michael Meeks <michael.me...@collabora.com> > > Date: Tue Nov 24 16:59:29 2015 +0000 > > > > vcl: re-introduce idle handling. > > > > which fixed the problem on master/5-1. Its non-trivial to backport that > > though to 5-0. Not sure how that should look if applied to 5-0 > > Right; it's ~impossible to back-port without some seriously > heavy-lifting / re-qualification process - I'm amused/interested to hear > that it fixed something ;-) I'd not support it going into -5-0 really. > I'd suggest that it'd be better to work out what two (or more) events > are getting mis-ordered to cause the issue in the bug - and get stack > traces from those code-points in both 5.0 and 5.1 - and I'd be happy to > take a look; perhaps in-person at FOSDEM. You are saying that this commit is not in 5-1? That's interesting because the bug is not present in 5-1. So that means that yet another commit "corrected" the bug in 5-1, I'd be happy to do the stack trace stuff with you during the Hackfest-before-FOSDEM. -- Lionel _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
