Hi Armin, Armin Le Grand píše v St 23. 12. 2015 v 10:04 +0100:
> > I would have thought the difference between "open" and "insert" was > > pretty clear (yes, I know there are plenty of clueless lusers out > > there). But it applies to pretty much ALL objects - if you "insert" > > then LO keeps the object unaltered, if you "open" then LO converts the > > object to a form that it can edit. > > That is a good argument to stay on that difference. But - when opening > and we have the possibility by doing this using the same filter as when > inserting - wouldn't it be better to use that and additionally 'break' > the SVG? With my UX hat on, I wouldn't break it on load, it's OK enough when there is a possibility to do so. When not broken, I suspect the move / resize etc. behaves more naturally (moves / resizes the entire picture). > This would lead to the same 'open' behaviour, guarantee SVG looking the > same despite of insert/open, deliver better quality and reduce number of > filters to maintain to one. I think the breaking (ie. loading the svg in a way it can be editable) was the biggest concern blocking this... So I guess if the fidelity (in the sense of shapes / gradients etc.) of a svg loaded via svgio and broken into shapes is similar / same (or even better) than the fidelity of svg loaded via filter/source/svg, I'd vote for removing filter/source/svg ;-) Can you please take this topic to the ESC? Thank you, Kendy _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
