Joel Madero wrote:
I think we should keep labeling those as INVALID
IMHO the time spent to implement this new
ABANDONED/EXPIRED/WHATEVERstate will be almost useless...
in both cases the fault of the bug closure is the reporting user
so I really do not care at all being diplomatic with people who don't
provide necessary informations.
To put this in context - this began after several users over the course
of a few weeks got quite irate at the WFM/Invalid status.
I don't understand why those people should feel irate or offended if the
INVALID state is due to their deficiency to provide a valide testcase or
answers to legitimate QA questions...
most of the time you got an INVALID tag after 7 months of inactivity...
so, again, no reason to blame QA if you can't answer questions after 7
months
I tend to agree that INVALID is accurate but if ABANDONED and/or EXPIRED will
make
them feel better, that's fine.
anyway, whatever you decide is ok for me.
but I think we are paying too much attention to users who are not giving
a valualble contribution to Bugzilla and LibO in general
I really don't care much about feelings of bad bug submitters.
probably most of them would deserve a PEBKAC status :-)
This will mostly be used by the automatic
pings and most QA people probably won't have to do much to maintain this
new status.
Best,
Joel
bye, Tommy
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
