Hi,

On Thursday, 2011-09-01 09:35:09 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:

> First, I think extending this from Persian to English already shows
> the biggest flaw of this approach:  Do you want to extend in in this
> way for all languages supported by LibO?  I would consider such
> extension to additional languages a localization task, a task that
> typically only consists of translating string resources.

String resources wouldn't be sufficient as different locales have
different rules for how to form a number string, especially when it
comes to ordinals. However, this looks more like spell-out than level
numbering and as such misses the point of the numbering provider. If we
wanted to implement spell-out I'd rather go for ICU's methods than
implementing yet another home-grown solution.

  Eike

-- 
 PGP/OpenPGP/GnuPG encrypted mail preferred in all private communication.
 Key ID: 0x293C05FD - 997A 4C60 CE41 0149 0DB3  9E96 2F1A D073 293C 05FD

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Reply via email to