On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Miklos Vajna <vmik...@collabora.co.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:32:02AM -0400, Ashod Nakashian < > ashnak...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Is this an unintentional coincidence that we're encouraged to cleanup, or > > is there a policy as-such? > > I don't think it's intentional that std::make_shared is under-used. > Before introducing new calls to boost::make_shared, it's a good idea to > check if you can first convert that boost::shared_ptr to std::shared_ptr > first, and then use std::make_shared, though. > Absolutely. I think boost -> std conversions are a given. Thanks for the clarification. I think it's cleaner and more efficient to use std::make_shared where possible.
_______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
