Please correct me if I am wrong. On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Pranav Kant <pranav...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Michael Meeks > <michael.me...@collabora.com> wrote: >> Hi Pranav, >> >> On Mon, 2015-07-20 at 01:04 +0530, Pranav Kant wrote: >>> This week I made few enhancements to the threading infrastructure that >>> I coded last week taking inspiration from Libreoffice Android. Now I >>> am making use of a thread pool, instead of creating a new thread(s) >>> everytime. All the LOK calls are now being called in thread(s) reused >>> from this pool. >> >> Hah =) so one thing that makes this particularly non-useful is the >> fact >> that LibreOfficeKit is single-plus-epsilon threaded ;-) >> >> So you'll get no useful benefit from using more than a single thread. > > I am making use of thread pool, but this pool consists of only single > thread. All the LOK calls will be queued and can reuse this thread, > hence saving me the time that it would take to create a new thread > (expensive process) for each LOK call. > > This was the reason behind making use of thread pool. I had no > intention of using more than one thread for LOK calls. > > > > > -- > Regards, > Pranav Kant > http://pranavk.me
-- Regards, Pranav Kant http://pranavk.me _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
