On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 1:22 AM, David Ostrovsky <d.ostrov...@gmx.de> wrote: > > I'd like to rise a question about reliability and fidelity of Jenkins > Gerrit change verification results. Consider this change: 16877.
It is so much easier to blame the tools indeed. > > * On patch set 8: [1] TB 66 voted VRFY+1 [2]. > * On patch set 9: [3] TB 60 voted VRFY1-1 [4]. > > There weren't any changes in the affected file textdoc.cxx between those > two patch sets. that is a bold thing to say when a patch change stuff like uno headers or rtl headers > Moreover, while I don't have access to Mac OS X, I > verified that the patch set 9 works as expected on Linux, with most > recent clang version available. MacOSX rarely use the 'most recent clang version available' tb66 is Yosemite Apple LLVM version 6.1.0 (clang-602.0.49) (based on LLVM 3.6.0svn) Target: x86_64-apple-darwin14.3.0 tb60 is Maverick Apple LLVM version 6.0 (clang-600.0.51) (based on LLVM 3.5svn) Target: x86_64-apple-darwin13.4.0 And your patch 8 would have failed the same way on tb58/tb59/tb60 Norbert _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
