Hello,
Giving a try to tdf#47832, I noticed that there were similar comments in
these files:
GraphicDisplayCacheEntry::IsCacheableAsBitmap:
487 // This function is based on GraphicManager::ImplCreateOutput(), in
fact it mostly copies
488 // it, the difference is that this one does not create anything, it
only checks if
489 // ImplCreateOutput() would use the optimization of using the single
bitmap.
490 // If you do changes here, change the original function too.
see
http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/svtools/source/graphic/grfcache.cxx#487
and GraphicManager::ImplCreateOutput
1112 // NOTE: If you do changes in this function, check
GraphicDisplayCacheEntry::IsCacheableAsBitmap
1113 // in grfcache.cxx too.
see
http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/svtools/source/graphic/grfmgr2.cxx#1112
But MetaActionType::FONT case isn't managed the same way:
In the first, there's just a fallthrough,
in the second one, there's some treatment.
1) Should we copy/paste the treatment in the first file?
2) Should we remove the treatment in the second file?
3) Should we just tweak the comment?
or simply nothing at all?
BTW, about graphic cache part, here's a try to optimize:
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/16958/
and here a failed attempt to fix the initial bug:
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/16941/ :-(
Julien
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/About-GraphicDisplayCacheEntry-IsCacheableAsBitmap-GraphicManager-ImplCreateOutput-tp4154227.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
