On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:37:34PM +0800, Matthew J. Francis wrote: > On 18/06/2015 22:23, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> Nope, branch point is not good. Given that a recompile takes hours, >> I'm rather unlikely to pursue this in detail. I started a "git >> bisect", let's see if I have enough patience to get to the end. > Note that if you have an automated reproducer - a failing test which > gives a nice obvious exit code is perfect - you can drive your > bisect automatically with "git bisect run" > It might not make it any faster, but at least you can ignore it and > get on with something else > (The argument it takes is a script which should exit with code: > 0 == good > 125 == skip (build failure) > anything else == bad > so in this case it should suffice to first build without tests, exit 125 on > failure, then run the tests and exit with whatever the result of that was) Sounds like our "bin/" directory should contain a script that takes the test name and does that :) -- Lioel _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
