On 11.06.2015 08:44, David Ostrovsky wrote: > Nothing causes more pain, frustration and disappointment than > unfulfilled expectations. > > I expect that master is always green. My definition of green is: > > $ make check > > with --enable-werror is passing on all three platforms: Linux|Mac|Win > 64. > > I thought that the same expectation is _consensus_ among core LO > developers. My definition of core LO developers: payed developer who is > working full time on LO.
at least with regard to tests passing, i certainly expect that, and complain on IRC whenever the current master doesn't meet my expectation. but i guess i should revert commits that break tests more often and earlier than i currently do... warnings are a bit less of an issue for me since they are usually trivial to fix, and you really have to use CI to check them on every platform. > So as master was broken again (my definition of broken is compiling > and/or linking was broken on some platforms, not to mention passing of > tests) I entered #libreoffice-dev channel on freenode and asked: > > _david_: "Master is broken again. Is that too much to expect that the > master is green?" > > One of LO core developers (see my definition of "core developers" above) > answered: > > _lo_core_developer_: "Yes, it's. The purpose of master is to be always > broken." let me guess... the core developer was a certain Finnish guy with a certain reputation for sarcastic remarks? _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
