Michael Meeks wrote: > What of this don't we cover with the crashtester validation ? > I guess, as I said, but:
> On Fri, 2015-06-05 at 18:59 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > > Same applies to OOXML, having one box running the Open XML SDK there & > > its validator would be awesome > > > (http://openxmldeveloper.org/blog/b/openxmldeveloper/archive/2010/03/08/8242.aspx) > I thought we're running officeotron for ooxml? The SDK above would be sortof nice, with it presumably having many more of the MSO idiosyncrasies codified? > > - have an up-to-date rng file in our tree, that needs to have > > extensions added the moment we start writing that out > > Is it that ? =) > And that, yep. ;) Cheers, -- Thorsten
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
