We could add an automatic validation test for checking the discovery of dynamic library dependencies on OS X & Linux.
- OS X: otool -L file - Linux: ldd file 2015-06-03 15:33 GMT+02:00 Michael Meeks <michael.me...@collabora.com>: > Hi guys, > > The ESC are interested in improving unit (and other automated) > testing > and are interested in concrete ideas for implementing new automated > tests to prevent regressions. We hope to turn this into a proposal for > the Board, which if approved -could- turn into a tender to fund more > work in this area. Having said that writing unit tests is every > developers' responsibility where feasible - so this ask focuses on new > infrastructure. > > It is noticeable that where there are existing tests & > infrastructure, > new tests are easier to create and often there are more of them - so are > there places where we should work to create infrastructure ? > > Is there something we can improve by throwing hardware at it ? as > we > have done for the crash-testing; if so what hardware is needed ? > > Is there a large area of code that is completely un-tested or > under-tested that you'd love us to invest in making test-able ? > > Is there a test that currently only runs in an obscure setup / > corner-case that we can invest in standardizing and making more easy to > use ? > > Constructive thoughts appreciated in reply here. > > ATB, > > Michael. > > -- > michael.me...@collabora.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot > > _______________________________________________ > LibreOffice mailing list > LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice > -- http://about.me/rbuj
_______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
