Thanks Stephan. So better to build using '--without-java' or better to install the older Java 1-6 ?
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Stephan Bergmann <sberg...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 11/19/2014 04:54 PM, Adam Fyne wrote: > >> I'm trying to build now on a totally fresh clean Macbook, >> after I've installed whatever was needed. >> (went with the easy approach, but was missing JDK and >> ANT so I've installed them separatly). >> >> After cloning, autogen & make - I get these unit-test errors: >> http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=iYF13p1s >> >> All the unit-tests seem to come from 'dbaccess'. >> I also see this line in the output: >> "No Java runtime present, requesting install." >> >> Wasn't JDK 64-bit enough ? >> > > see <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2014- > October/064096.html> "Java problem when running > CppunitTest_dbaccess_dialog_save on OS X 10.10 with Oracle JDK 1.8" and < > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2014-October/064097.html> > "Re: Java problem when running CppunitTest_dbaccess_dialog_save on OS X > 10.10 with Oracle JDK 1.8" > _______________________________________________ > LibreOffice mailing list > LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice > -- *Adam Fyne* Interoperability Team Leader Twitter <http://www.twitter.com/cloudoninc> | LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudon> | Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/cloudoninc>
_______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
