Hi, On Tue, 2014-10-28 at 07:51 +0100, Laurent Godard wrote: > Hi Matus, > > Thanks a lot for your detailled response > > I'm actually in holidays with family and will be back next week; I hope > then to be able to continue this work (but feel free to start it !)
enjoy :-) > Regarding output results, the approach i took was to first gather all > the results in the csv file > Then post-processing it in a spreadsheet (say, randomly, calc) and use > standard filters to isolate the tests Ah, I see. Nice, I would not be able to come up with something like that :-) > >> - set IS_PERFCHECK > > > > this would be set all the time (not needed) > > make perfcheck would just run tests under callgrind, where it makes sense > > > > ok but i still do not catch how the beast would know if callgrind is > running or not. how would startImplemntation and endImplementation > behave if callgrind is not running (case of normal tests) callgrind runs if you use 'make perfcheck' or set gb_CppunitTest_VALGRINDTOOL explicitely. If callgrind does not run, startImplementation should do nothing. So, I've done http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=e4e7f9d88e05fa610a72245c40f4e47f85db61ff Hopefully it will help us. Example test: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/11296/ Would be nice to rebase your patches and merge them. Thanks, Matus _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
