Hi, On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 11:47:30AM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > Would not the best thing to do be to do bibisect builds on the > release baseline, as is done for the TDF builds? That way, the > builds should work on as many machines as possible.
As discussed explicitly in the call: I have no time at all for that, you are free to volunteer. Right now, I plan to do the alpha1 bibisect build to keep Robinsons backs free for the Bugzilla migration. Robinson will then take over for the beta/branchoff builds of bibisect, and if you think its worth setting up a baseline chroot for the bibisects then, that might be an option (possibly redoing the stuff I build on that baseline). Then again, as per: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/HowToBibisect#Manual_setup_.28download_a_tarball.29 there are currently _no_ reports of recent build being not universal. Michael Stahl once ranted about the old LibreOffice 3.5 build as they linked against a system libjpeg, but that was never affected the build after that. If anyone is volunteering to rebuild LibreOffice 3.5 without libjpeg, you are invited as Michael never did that[1]. ;) Best, Bjoern [1] Which is even somewhat understandable, given the quality of our build back then, needing hotpatching like this: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/gitweb?p=dev-tools.git;a=blobdiff;f=bibisect/build.sh;h=42427226aaa73b4764d0181f5c40aa4105809b67;hp=831436cc138737a88647893e29af20ecd4477731;hb=80e0a38aae8ed422e8c4350ef3a234bc92f504fb;hpb=f6bdfcfce464f40e51a8c1ff7aca9b08a93f4cb8 _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
