On 14.10.2014 15:46, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 10/14/2014 12:06 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: >> I havent bibisected with that repo myself yet, just saw that e.g.: >> >> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84733#c1 >> >> has a lot of skipped commits. > > (Looks like I at least cannot easily reproduce that on my Fedora > machine, as that bibisect repo is apparently build --with-system-jpeg so > requires a libjpeg.so.8 I don't have.) >
yes, that's an endemic problem with all bibisect repos, except the very latest from Bjoern, they're all missing --without-system-jpeg and thus require that particular libjpeg.so.8 on the system. i've worked around that by just building it from source and LD_PRELOADing it. on a related note, why are we bundling IJG libjpeg-8 [1] ... even libjpeg-9 on master with LO, instead of libjpeg-turbo [2] like most linux distros do nowadays? apparently the prevailing opinion is that libjpeg > 6 just adds questionable new features that, when used, cause interop problems with older software that supports only the ISO standard, i.e., what's implemented in libjpeg-6, whereas libjpeg-turbo is standard JPEG and is quite optimized on x86 CPUs. this seems to be a good summary of the situation: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2014/08/msg00000.html [1] http://ijg.org/ [2] http://www.libjpeg-turbo.org/ _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
