On Sun, 2011-07-03 at 23:07 +0200, Benoit Dolives wrote: Yup, patch fixes fixes the problem. Thanks for this. Pushed now to master.
Can you confirm that this is under our preferred LGPLv3+/MPL license combo ? > Concerning your open question, the proposed patch checks if the > searched string belongs to the selection by using the same mechanism > as the common search command. Therefore it should have the same > behaviour as the search command in both cases (common or advanced > search/replace). Hmm, if I stick e.g. Apple banana in there, select nothing, search and replace with regular expression of b.*a to match banana but where the search string has a different length to the text it will match, with "comments" enabled, then that one doesn't replace. AFAICS that "length is the same" branch is just an optimization. When removed everything works as I would expect, so I pushed that as a follow up fix. Would be good if you could double-check my changes there, and if the equal length code is based on some other code elsewhere, there might be an additional fix needed for the legacy stuff too. There's probably a few more gotchas with search and replace in writer, (e.g. how come I can't use "replace all" when comments are selected) if you dig around bugzilla for them :-) C. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice